The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), joined by seven states, has filed a lawsuit against Ticketmaster and its parent company, Live Nation, accusing the ticketing giant of engaging in deceptive and unfair ticketing practices. According to the FTC, Ticketmaster allegedly enables brokers to buy large quantities of tickets using sophisticated tools and bypassing security measures, only to resell them at significantly higher prices to genuine fans.
The lawsuit also claims that Ticketmaster misleads consumers by hiding mandatory fees, which can add up to 44% of a ticket’s cost, until the final stage of purchase. With Ticketmaster controlling approximately 80% of major event ticket sales in the U.S., this legal action highlights serious concerns over consumer rights, market fairness, and transparency in the live entertainment industry.
Read More: Diabetes-Friendly Eating Tips for Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur
Background: Ticketmaster and Live Nation
Ticketmaster, founded in 1976, has grown to dominate the ticketing industry, controlling approximately 80% of the primary ticketing for major concert venues in the United States. Its parent company, Live Nation, is one of the world’s largest live entertainment companies, managing everything from concerts and festivals to ticket sales and promotions.
From 2019 to 2024, consumers spent an estimated $82.6 billion on tickets through Ticketmaster, according to the FTC. Despite its widespread use, Ticketmaster has faced increasing scrutiny over its pricing, resale practices, and alleged lack of transparency in recent years.
Allegations: Coordinating with Ticket Brokers
According to the FTC, Ticketmaster is allegedly “tacitly coordinating with brokers,” enabling them to purchase large quantities of tickets at face value and then resell them at significantly higher prices. This practice, the agency claims, prioritizes profit for brokers over fair access for genuine fans.
The complaint details how brokers routinely bypass Ticketmaster’s security measures by creating multiple accounts using proxy IP addresses. In some cases, the company allegedly provided brokers with tech support through software called TradeDesk, a platform designed to track and aggregate ticket purchases across multiple accounts. This interface allegedly made it easier for brokers to manage resales efficiently, further tilting the market in their favor.
The FTC’s investigation revealed that just five brokers controlled over 6,000 Ticketmaster accounts, collectively holding more than 240,000 tickets for over 2,500 events. Internal Ticketmaster communications cited by the FTC suggest that company executives were aware of the problem and “turn a blind eye as a matter of policy” when brokers exceeded purchase limits.
Hidden Fees and Consumer Deception
Another key allegation concerns Ticketmaster’s pricing practices. The FTC claims that Ticketmaster often advertises tickets without including mandatory fees, which can reach up to 44% of the ticket’s base price. These fees only become visible at the final stage of the transaction, potentially misleading consumers about the true cost of attending an event.
From 2019 to 2025, these fees reportedly totaled $16.4 billion, a significant portion of Ticketmaster’s revenue. According to the FTC, this lack of transparency constitutes deceptive marketing, as consumers may feel misled when confronted with unexpected costs at checkout.
Consumer Impact: Who Pays the Price?
For concertgoers and sports fans, these practices can translate into frustration and financial strain. Fans hoping to purchase tickets at face value often find themselves competing against professional resellers, resulting in higher prices and limited availability. The FTC argues that Ticketmaster’s alleged coordination with brokers restricts access to genuine fans, creating an unfair market environment.
The resale of tickets at inflated prices has long been a source of consumer complaints. With large events selling out in minutes, fans are often forced to turn to secondary markets, sometimes paying two or three times the original ticket price. The FTC lawsuit underscores the agency’s position that such practices harm ordinary consumers and undermine the integrity of the ticketing system.
Political Context: An Escalation Under Trump’s Executive Order
The FTC’s aggressive stance against Ticketmaster has roots in both Democratic and Republican administrations, though the lawsuit references directives from former President Donald Trump. FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson cited a March executive order issued by Trump, which emphasized the federal government’s responsibility to protect Americans from exploitative ticket pricing practices.
In the press release, Ferguson stated:
“American live entertainment is the best in the world and should be accessible to all of us. It should not cost an arm and a leg to take the family to a baseball game or attend your favorite musician’s show. The Trump-Vance FTC is working hard to ensure that fans have a shot at buying fair-priced tickets, and today’s lawsuit is a monumental step in that direction.”
While the current administration has continued pursuing oversight of Ticketmaster, the FTC is framing this legal action as a continuation of policy objectives outlined during Trump’s presidency, highlighting bipartisan concern about consumer rights in the ticketing market.
Legal Details: What the Lawsuit Alleges
The lawsuit alleges several specific violations of consumer protection laws:
- Collusion with Brokers: Ticketmaster allegedly allows brokers to bypass security measures and purchase tickets in bulk, contrary to stated limits.
- Deceptive Pricing: Tickets are advertised without mandatory fees, misleading consumers about the actual cost.
- Facilitation of Resale Platforms: The company allegedly provides software and support to brokers to help them track and resell tickets efficiently.
- Market Domination: By controlling 80% of primary ticket sales for major venues, Ticketmaster allegedly limits competition, giving brokers and the company undue influence over pricing.
If proven, these allegations could lead to significant financial penalties, regulatory oversight, and structural changes in Ticketmaster’s business model.
Ticketmaster’s Response
As of Thursday afternoon, Ticketmaster had not issued a public response to the lawsuit. Historically, the company has defended its business practices, asserting that its platforms aim to make tickets available to as many fans as possible and that resale options provide legitimate flexibility for ticket holders.
Observers expect Ticketmaster to vigorously contest the lawsuit, arguing that the FTC’s claims exaggerate the extent of broker influence and misrepresent the company’s technological safeguards against automated purchasing. The legal proceedings are likely to be complex and could take years to resolve, with potential implications for the broader ticketing industry.
Broader Implications for the Entertainment Industry
The lawsuit highlights ongoing tensions in the live entertainment sector, where digital ticketing platforms have transformed how events are sold and consumed. High-profile disputes over ticket pricing, hidden fees, and secondary markets have sparked public debate and regulatory scrutiny.
If the FTC succeeds, it could set a precedent for increased oversight of ticketing platforms, potentially forcing changes in how tickets are sold, disclosed, and resold. Such outcomes could benefit consumers by promoting transparency and fairness but could also disrupt current business models for venues, artists, and ticketing companies.
What This Means for Fans
For consumers, the lawsuit signals growing federal attention to ticketing practices. Fans may see stricter limits on bulk purchases by brokers, clearer disclosure of fees, and more equitable access to high-demand events.
However, the legal process will likely be slow, meaning that immediate changes for consumers are uncertain. In the meantime, fans are advised to remain vigilant, compare prices across platforms, and understand the full cost of tickets before completing purchases.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who filed the lawsuit against Ticketmaster?
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), along with seven U.S. states, filed the lawsuit against Ticketmaster and its parent company, Live Nation.
What are the main allegations?
Ticketmaster is accused of enabling brokers to purchase tickets in bulk and resell them at higher prices, bypassing security measures, and misleading consumers by hiding mandatory fees until checkout.
How much of the ticket market does Ticketmaster control?
The company reportedly controls about 80% of primary ticket sales for major concert and sports venues in the U.S.
How much do hidden fees add to ticket prices?
Mandatory fees can reach up to 44% of the ticket’s base price.
What is TradeDesk, and why is it mentioned?
TradeDesk is software allegedly provided by Ticketmaster to brokers, helping them track and manage bulk ticket purchases more efficiently.
What could happen if Ticketmaster loses the lawsuit?
The company could face fines, regulatory oversight, and requirements to change its ticketing and resale practices to ensure fairness and transparency.
Conclusion
The FTC’s lawsuit against Ticketmaster and Live Nation represents a significant escalation in the fight against alleged deceptive ticketing practices. By highlighting issues such as bulk purchases by brokers, hidden fees, and technological facilitation of resales, the complaint underscores concerns about fairness, transparency, and consumer protection in the entertainment industry.
